[Academic] Research Audit Outputs

[John Jeffers]

Just a reminder to do this if you have not already done so.

John
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Research Audit Outputs
Date: 	Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:36:19 +0000
From: 	John Jeffers <john.jeffers at strath.ac.uk>
To: 	academic at phys.strath.ac.uk



Dear All,

It is the time of year when you should be proposing new outputs for the 
Research Audit. As usual you do this via the tab on your Pure page. Some 
guidance.

Last year too many people just submitted stuff that they thought might 
possibly get rated 3*. This created a lot of wasted work for your 
colleagues and most of these outputs were not rated highly. With the 
likely changes to the REF in 2020 resulting in a reduction of the number 
of submitted outputs it is probable that in the final submission we will 
not even submit some of our 3* work. Therefore can I ask you all to 
propose only any unproposed outputs published since January 2014 that 
you are /certain/ are at least 3*. We can deal with others that might be 
3* or above nearer the REF deadline when the picture will be clearer. 
Please try to get this done before the holiday period to give us time to 
review the outputs in time for the audit.

Feel free to contact me, particularly newer members of staff, if you do 
not have a reasonably clear picture of what to do, or of what a 2*/3*/4* 
output looks like.

Best Regards
John

-- 
Prof. John Jeffers
http://www.strath.ac.uk/physics/staff/academic/johnjeffers/
http://cnqo.phys.strath.ac.uk/people/academic-staff/john-jeffers/
T: +44 141 548 3457



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://phys.strath.ac.uk/pipermail/academic/attachments/20161206/4bf4cf9a/attachment.html